Tottenham Hotspur’s defensive deficiencies were exposed in today’s 2-1 loss to Newcastle United.
Despite dominating major sections of the game and creating numerous scoring opportunities, Spurs were unable to turn their advantage into a victory, resulting in a disheartening loss.
Newcastle took the lead shortly before halftime when Harvey Barnes converted a well-delivered cross from Lloyd Kelly.
Tottenham drew level in the second half thanks to a fortunate own goal by Dan Burn, but their comeback was short lived.
Sky Sports co-commentator Andy Hinchcliffe was particularly critical of Spurs’ defensive efforts, especially in the sequence leading up to Newcastle’s decisive second goal.
Hinchcliffe highlighted that Cristian Romero was blameworthy of ball-watching and not following Jacob Murphy’s run, permitting Murphy to effectively get in behind the guard. Murphy at that point set up Alexander Isak for the winning objective.
The savant pushed the significance of Tottenham‘s shields keeping up mindfulness of their environment and situating themselves way better to counter potential dangers.
Romero’s transitory slip by in center, together with Fate Udogie’s disappointment to stamp Murphy, cleared out the Lilywhites uncovered and eventually driven to their vanquish.
Hinchcliffe remarked on Sky Sports:
“Defensively from Tottenham, usually fair really shocking.
“Don’t ball-watch, you have got to drop off. Romero fair appears to be watching the ball, no thought where [Jacob] Murphy is, [Predetermination] Udogie hasn’t followed him in.
“It’s as well simple for Murphy to urge in behind that Tottenham back line.”
This misfortune underscores the repeating protective issues that have tormented Goads. As Tottenham thrust forward in their season, it’ll be basic to address these cautious inadequacies to secure way better comes about and reinforce their backline.
Whereas Spurs’ capacity to control matches and produce chances is obvious, their victory this season will intensely depend on changing over them and moving forward their cautious robustness.
Leave a Comment